TW
Tripwire
Find contracts. Test them. Review real vulns.

Analysis Run

6b9d708b-d152-4b72-bd47-cf0e0b1cc3ed

failed
Chain ID
1
Address
Block Number
Created
Sun, Dec 28, 2025 3:06 AM
Review Summary

What survived the funnel

Open this run to answer one question: is this real attacker-relevant behavior with real impact, or just normal contract plumbing?

Confirmed
0
Validated
0
Source
Verified
Review Backing
Not yet
Best current signal
Untrusted DELEGATECALL target reachable
crit 0 high 0 direct contract
Review Checklist
1. Read the findings table first. Ignore raw jobs until the result looks real.
2. Confirm attacker control, not just the existence of a sink.
3. Confirm money or privilege impact.
4. Keep it if the behavior is real. Kill it if this is normal proxy, admin, or upgrade plumbing.

Processing Jobs

Status & attempts
ID Type Status Attempts Heartbeat
30283 report.consolidate complete 1 / 1 3 months ago
73882 artifact.fetch failed 1 / 3 1 week ago
73883 tool.cast_disasm complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
73884 analysis.bundle complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
73885 capability.graph complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
73886 detector.run complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
73887 validation.fork complete 1 / 3 1 week ago

Artifact

Runtime bytecode: available
Creation TX:
Deployer:
Proxy: no
Implementation:
Verified Source: yes

Slither

tool.slither

No slither job recorded yet.

Codex

report.consolidate
Job Status
complete
Attempts
1 / 1
Findings
0
No findings?
yes
Summary
Reviewed `contracts/contracts/Avocado.sol`; no exploitable vulnerabilities identified within the specified focus areas. Residual risk: correctness depends on the factory providing valid deployment data and on implementation contracts honoring the required storage layout.
View stderr
[codex:1333225] OpenAI Codex v0.77.0 (research preview)
[codex:1333225] --------
[codex:1333225] workdir: /tmp/codex-multi-v81f_qta
[codex:1333225] model: gpt-5.2-codex
[codex:1333225] provider: openai
[codex:1333225] approval: never
[codex:1333225] sandbox: read-only
[codex:1333225] reasoning effort: xhigh
[codex:1333225] reasoning summaries: auto
[codex:1333225] session id: 019b62eb-4258-79e1-89c4-a43ef595cf37
[codex:1333225] --------
[codex:1333225] user
[codex:1333225] You are a security auditor. Audit this Solidity codebase for exploitable vulnerabilities.
[codex:1333225] Focus on: reentrancy, access control, upgradeability/proxy issues, signature validation, oracle manipulation,
[codex:1333225] accounting/invariant breaks, external call patterns, unchecked return values, and dangerous delegatecall.
[codex:1333225] 
[codex:1333225] Scope rules:
[codex:1333225] - You MUST fully read `AUDIT_BUNDLE.txt` before concluding. It contains the complete contents of all first-party `contracts/**/*.sol` files.
[codex:1333225] - Treat `lib/` and `@openzeppelin/` as third-party dependencies; skip them unless there is a concrete misuse angle in first-party code.
[codex:1333225] 
[codex:1333225] Output MUST be valid JSON matching the provided schema.
[codex:1333225] - If you find nothing meaningful: set no_findings=true and findings=[].
[codex:1333225] - Otherwise: set no_findings=false and include findings with severity/category/title and file/line locations when possible.
[codex:1333225] 
[codex:1333225] Output constraints (IMPORTANT):
[codex:1333225] - severity MUST be exactly one of: info, low, medium, high, critical (lowercase).
[codex:1333225] - category MUST be exactly one of: access_control, reentrancy, math, oracle, upgradeability, auth, other.
[codex:1333225] mcp startup: no servers
[codex:1333225] 
[codex:1333225] thinking
[codex:1333225] **Preparing to read AUDIT_BUNDLE.txt**
[codex:1333225] exec
[codex:1333225] /bin/bash -lc ls in /tmp/codex-multi-v81f_qta succeeded in 6ms:
[codex:1333225] AUDIT_BUNDLE.txt
[codex:1333225] codex-output-schema.json
[codex:1333225] contracts
[codex:1333225] exec
[codex:1333225] /bin/bash -lc 'cat AUDIT_BUNDLE.txt' in /tmp/codex-multi-v81f_qta succeeded in 6ms:
[codex:1333225] This file concatenates the full contents of first-party Solidity sources for auditing.
[codex:1333225] 
[codex:1333225] ================================================================================
[codex:1333225] FILE: contracts/contracts/Avocado.sol
[codex:1333225] ================================================================================
[codex:1333225] // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
[codex:1333225] pragma solidity >=0.8.18;
[codex:1333225] 
[codex:1333225] /// @title   IAvocado
[codex:1333225] /// @notice  interface to access internal vars on-chain
[codex:1333225] interface IAvocado {
[codex:1333225]     function _avoImpl() external view returns (address);
[codex:1333225] 
[codex:1333225]     function _data() external view returns (uint256);
[codex:1333225] 
[codex:1333225]     function _owner() external view returns (address);
[codex:1333225] }
[codex:1333225] 
[codex:1333225] /// @title      Avocado
[codex:1333225] /// @notice     Proxy for Avocados as deployed by the AvoFactory.
[codex:1333225] 
[codex:1333225] thinking
[codex:1333225] **Analyzing proxy contract vulnerabilities**
[codex:1333225] codex
[codex:1333225] {"no_findings":true,"summary":"Reviewed `contracts/contracts/Avocado.sol`; no exploitable vulnerabilities identified within the specified focus areas. Residual risk: correctness depends on the factory providing valid deployment data and on implementation contracts honoring the required storage layout.","findings":[]}
[codex:1333225] tokens used
[codex:1333225] 11,431
[codex:1333225] {"no_findings":true,"summary":"Reviewed `contracts/contracts/Avocado.sol`; no exploitable vulnerabilities identified within the specified focus areas. Residual risk: correctness depends on the factory providing valid deployment data and on implementation contracts honoring the required storage layout.","findings":[]}
Metadata
{
    "codex": {
        "ran_at": "2025-12-28T03:06:05.121907+00:00",
        "returncode": 0
    },
    "summary": "Reviewed `contracts/contracts/Avocado.sol`; no exploitable vulnerabilities identified within the specified focus areas. Residual risk: correctness depends on the factory providing valid deployment data and on implementation contracts honoring the required storage layout.",
    "raw_final": {
        "summary": "Reviewed `contracts/contracts/Avocado.sol`; no exploitable vulnerabilities identified within the specified focus areas. Residual risk: correctness depends on the factory providing valid deployment data and on implementation contracts honoring the required storage layout.",
        "findings": [],
        "no_findings": true
    },
    "no_findings": true,
    "schema_version": 1
}

Opcode Heuristics

tool.cast_disasm
Delegatecall
1
Selfdestruct
0
CREATE2
0
CALL-family (heavy)
0
EXT*/BALANCE
0
Total opcodes
108
Flags
delegatecall_present proxy_like_runtime
View cast disassembly output
00000000: PUSH1 0x80
00000002: PUSH1 0x40
00000004: MSTORE
00000005: PUSH32 0x0000000000000000000000087f119b3daf8aaa660ba917b592b33335c8ac1459
00000026: PUSH1 0x00
00000028: CALLDATALOAD
00000029: PUSH32 0x4d42058500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000004a: DUP2
0000004b: ADD
0000004c: PUSH2 0x006f
0000004f: JUMPI
00000050: PUSH20 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
00000065: DUP3
00000066: AND
00000067: PUSH1 0x00
00000069: MSTORE
0000006a: PUSH1 0x20
0000006c: PUSH1 0x00
0000006e: RETURN
0000006f: JUMPDEST
00000070: PUSH32 0x68beab3f00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
00000091: DUP2
00000092: SUB
00000093: PUSH2 0x00a0
00000096: JUMPI
00000097: DUP2
00000098: PUSH1 0x00
0000009a: MSTORE
0000009b: PUSH1 0x20
0000009d: PUSH1 0x00
0000009f: RETURN
000000a0: JUMPDEST
000000a1: PUSH20 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
000000b6: PUSH1 0x00
000000b8: SLOAD
000000b9: AND
000000ba: PUSH32 0x874095c600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000db: DUP3
000000dc: SUB
000000dd: PUSH2 0x00ea
000000e0: JUMPI
000000e1: DUP1
000000e2: PUSH1 0x00
000000e4: MSTORE
000000e5: PUSH1 0x20
000000e7: PUSH1 0x00
000000e9: RETURN
000000ea: JUMPDEST
000000eb: CALLDATASIZE
000000ec: PUSH1 0x00
000000ee: DUP1
000000ef: CALLDATACOPY
000000f0: PUSH1 0x00
000000f2: DUP1
000000f3: CALLDATASIZE
000000f4: PUSH1 0x00
000000f6: DUP5
000000f7: GAS
000000f8: DELEGATECALL
000000f9: SWAP2
000000fa: POP
000000fb: POP
000000fc: RETURNDATASIZE
000000fd: PUSH1 0x00
000000ff: DUP1
00000100: RETURNDATACOPY
00000101: DUP1
00000102: DUP1
00000103: ISZERO
00000104: PUSH2 0x010c
00000107: JUMPI
00000108: RETURNDATASIZE
00000109: PUSH1 0x00
0000010b: RETURN
0000010c: JUMPDEST
0000010d: RETURNDATASIZE
0000010e: PUSH1 0x00
00000110: REVERT
00000111: INVALID
00000112: LOG2
00000113: PUSH5 0x6970667358
00000119: UNKNOWN(0x22)
0000011a: SLT
0000011b: KECCAK256
0000011c: UNKNOWN(0xBF)
0000011d: OR
0000011e: XOR
0000011f: CALLVALUE
00000120: UNKNOWN(0xB0)
00000121: SWAP5
00000122: DUP15
00000123: UNKNOWN(0xBF)
00000124: REVERT
00000125: NOT
00000126: PUSH14 0x6a4208dbd5d0a71f76dfac9d9049
00000135: SWAP14
00000136: UNKNOWN(0xE3)
00000137: XOR
00000138: UNKNOWN(0xC5)
00000139: SWAP6
0000013a: PC
0000013b: UNKNOWN(0xFC)
0000013c: PUSH5 0x736f6c6343
00000142: STOP
00000143: ADDMOD
00000144: SLT
00000145: STOP
00000146: CALLER

Findings

validated = confirmed for call sinks; sink observed for others
Severity Category Tool Title Confidence Validated Confirmed Details
critical upgradeability detector Untrusted DELEGATECALL target reachable 70 no no
view
trace_id: 0x6a2b35aff378838168bdf5a9088d52793c699f172ae61df5ae7c60a07827659c
call_targets: 0xea4ebf3ec9f3be577a04b02782d8683b2304b614
target_varies: no
classification: constant_target
validation_json
{
    "sink": "DELEGATECALL",
    "errors": 0,
    "status": "sink_reached",
    "attempts": 1,
    "trace_id": "0x6a2b35aff378838168bdf5a9088d52793c699f172ae61df5ae7c60a07827659c",
    "confirmed": false,
    "trace_mode": "callTracer",
    "call_targets": [
        "0xea4ebf3ec9f3be577a04b02782d8683b2304b614"
    ],
    "matched_probe": null,
    "target_varies": false,
    "classification": "constant_target"
}
witness_json
{
    "notes": "heuristic witness; entrypoints are best-effort selectors with zeroed calldata",
    "constraints": [],
    "entrypoints": [
        {
            "calldata": "0x",
            "selector": "fallback",
            "calldata_variants": [
                "0x"
            ]
        }
    ]
}
evidence_json
{
    "examples": [
        {
            "pc": 248,
            "opcode": "DELEGATECALL",
            "returndata_checked": null,
            "value_expression_category": "n/a",
            "target_expression_category": "computed"
        }
    ],
    "guards_detected": [],
    "delegatecall_count": 1,
    "untrusted_delegatecall_count": 1
}
medium upgradeability cast DELEGATECALL present 80 no
view
evidence_json
{
    "notes": "delegatecall enables execution in caller context; common in proxies/upgradeable patterns",
    "delegatecall_count": 1
}
info upgradeability cast Likely proxy-like runtime 60 no
view
evidence_json
{
    "notes": "short runtime with SLOAD and DELEGATECALL resembles minimal proxy/upgradeable pattern",
    "sload_count": 1,
    "total_opcodes": 108,
    "delegatecall_count": 1
}