TW
Tripwire
Find contracts. Test them. Review real vulns.

Analysis Run

2436b45f-b715-42fc-9d78-259a1b705b2d

complete
Chain ID
1
Address
0x6e653024fe23e4a7f2a1c8e14c388f71dd44668f
Block Number
—
Created
Mon, Jan 5, 2026 2:46 AM
Review Summary

What survived the funnel

Open this run to answer one question: is this real attacker-relevant behavior with real impact, or just normal contract plumbing?

back to vulns open contract
Confirmed
0
Validated
0
Source
Bytecode only
Review Backing
Not yet
Best current signal
SELFDESTRUCT reachable
crit 0 high 0 direct contract
Review Checklist
1. Read the findings table first. Ignore raw jobs until the result looks real.
2. Confirm attacker control, not just the existence of a sink.
3. Confirm money or privilege impact.
4. Keep it if the behavior is real. Kill it if this is normal proxy, admin, or upgrade plumbing.

Processing Jobs

Status & attempts
ID Type Status Attempts Heartbeat
31662 report.consolidate complete 1 / 1 3 months ago
95395 artifact.fetch complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
95396 tool.cast_disasm complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
95397 analysis.bundle complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
95398 capability.graph complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
95399 detector.run complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
95400 validation.fork complete 1 / 3 1 week ago

Artifact

Runtime bytecode: available
Creation TX: —
Deployer: —
Proxy: no
Implementation:
—
Verified Source: no

Slither

tool.slither

No slither job recorded yet.

Codex

report.consolidate
Job Status
complete
Attempts
1 / 1
Findings
0
No findings?
yes
Summary
Reviewed the runtime bytecode bundle; it matches a minimal proxy-style delegatecall to a fixed implementation address (0x273ca078df99670c5613522cc32703cf7f473dfd) with no visible upgrade or control flow that enables direct value extraction from bytecode alone. No concrete exploit path identified without analyzing the implementation.
View stderr 
[codex:410323] OpenAI Codex v0.77.0 (research preview)
[codex:410323] --------
[codex:410323] workdir: /tmp/codex-multi-wdnkkq_6
[codex:410323] model: gpt-5.2-codex
[codex:410323] provider: openai
[codex:410323] approval: never
[codex:410323] sandbox: read-only
[codex:410323] reasoning effort: xhigh
[codex:410323] reasoning summaries: auto
[codex:410323] session id: 019b8c0c-415a-7ae2-8f05-c53210a438db
[codex:410323] --------
[codex:410323] user
[codex:410323] You are a profit-focused exploit hunter analyzing EVM bytecode. Your ONLY goal is finding ways to extract value (ETH, tokens, NFTs) from this contract.
[codex:410323] 
[codex:410323] Read `BYTECODE_BUNDLE.txt` completely before concluding.
[codex:410323] 
[codex:410323] ONLY REPORT if you find a CONCRETE, EXPLOITABLE path to profit. We do NOT care about:
[codex:410323] - Gas inefficiency, code quality, or best practices
[codex:410323] - Theoretical vulnerabilities without a clear extraction path
[codex:410323] - Generic footguns (unchecked return values, etc.) unless they enable theft
[codex:410323] - Issues requiring social engineering or off-chain coordination
[codex:410323] 
[codex:410323] PATTERNS WORTH INVESTIGATING in bytecode:
[codex:410323] - CALL/DELEGATECALL with controllable destination or calldata
[codex:410323] - Value transfers (CALL with non-zero value) without prior CALLER/ORIGIN checks
[codex:410323] - SSTORE to low slots (0-10) that might be owner/admin storage
[codex:410323] - ecrecover (signature validation) - look for missing nonce/replay protection
[codex:410323] - External calls before state updates (reentrancy)
[codex:410323] - SELFDESTRUCT with controllable beneficiary
[codex:410323] - Proxy patterns (DELEGATECALL to storage slot) with unprotected upgrade paths
[codex:410323] 
[codex:410323] For each finding, you MUST explain:
[codex:410323] 1. The specific bytecode pattern/offsets that indicate the vulnerability
[codex:410323] 2. The concrete sequence of transactions to extract value
[codex:410323] 3. Why you believe this is exploitable (not just suspicious)
[codex:410323] 
[codex:410323] If you cannot identify a concrete profit path from bytecode alone: set no_findings=true.
[codex:410323] Do NOT hallucinate. Bytecode-only analysis is limited - be honest about uncertainty.
[codex:410323] 
[codex:410323] Output MUST be valid JSON matching the provided schema.
[codex:410323] - severity: info, low, medium, high, critical (use high/critical ONLY for clear extraction paths)
[codex:410323] - category: access_control, reentrancy, math, oracle, upgradeability, auth, other
[codex:410323] mcp startup: no servers
[codex:410323] 
[codex:410323] thinking
[codex:410323] **Reading file contents**
[codex:410323] exec
[codex:410323] /bin/bash -lc ls in /tmp/codex-multi-wdnkkq_6 succeeded in 6ms:
[codex:410323] BYTECODE_BUNDLE.txt
[codex:410323] codex-output-schema.json
[codex:410323] exec
[codex:410323] /bin/bash -lc 'cat BYTECODE_BUNDLE.txt' in /tmp/codex-multi-wdnkkq_6 succeeded in 6ms:
[codex:410323] Runtime bytecode bundle for best-effort auditing.
[codex:410323] Note: without verified source, conclusions are low-confidence unless a concrete pattern is visible.
[codex:410323] 
[codex:410323] FILE: runtime_bytecode.hex
[codex:410323] 0x608060405260405173273ca078df99670c5613522cc32703cf7f473dfd903660008237602081368185600019f43d6000833e808015603b573d83f35b3d83fdfea165627a7a72305820994a9273d555ca8bc44fcf8da3a2cabbd1c3f99f20dc0407fcff5ef7d663cc5f0029
[codex:410323] 
[codex:410323] thinking
[codex:410323] **Analyzing minimal proxy bytecode**
[codex:410323] codex
[codex:410323] {"no_findings":true,"summary":"Reviewed the runtime bytecode bundle; it matches a minimal proxy-style delegatecall to a fixed implementation address (0x273ca078df99670c5613522cc32703cf7f473dfd) with no visible upgrade or control flow that enables direct value extraction from bytecode alone. No concrete exploit path identified without analyzing the implementation.","findings":[]}
[codex:410323] tokens used
[codex:410323] 10,122
[codex:410323] {"no_findings":true,"summary":"Reviewed the runtime bytecode bundle; it matches a minimal proxy-style delegatecall to a fixed implementation address (0x273ca078df99670c5613522cc32703cf7f473dfd) with no visible upgrade or control flow that enables direct value extraction from bytecode alone. No concrete exploit path identified without analyzing the implementation.","findings":[]}
Metadata 
{
    "codex": {
        "ran_at": "2026-01-05T02:46:21.954618+00:00",
        "returncode": 0
    },
    "summary": "Reviewed the runtime bytecode bundle; it matches a minimal proxy-style delegatecall to a fixed implementation address (0x273ca078df99670c5613522cc32703cf7f473dfd) with no visible upgrade or control flow that enables direct value extraction from bytecode alone. No concrete exploit path identified without analyzing the implementation.",
    "raw_final": {
        "summary": "Reviewed the runtime bytecode bundle; it matches a minimal proxy-style delegatecall to a fixed implementation address (0x273ca078df99670c5613522cc32703cf7f473dfd) with no visible upgrade or control flow that enables direct value extraction from bytecode alone. No concrete exploit path identified without analyzing the implementation.",
        "findings": [],
        "no_findings": true
    },
    "no_findings": true,
    "schema_version": 1
}

Opcode Heuristics

tool.cast_disasm
Delegatecall
1
Selfdestruct
1
CREATE2
0
CALL-family (heavy)
0
EXT*/BALANCE
0
Total opcodes
49
Flags
delegatecall_present selfdestruct_present
View cast disassembly output 
00000000: PUSH1 0x80
00000002: PUSH1 0x40
00000004: MSTORE
00000005: PUSH1 0x40
00000007: MLOAD
00000008: PUSH20 0x273ca078df99670c5613522cc32703cf7f473dfd
0000001d: SWAP1
0000001e: CALLDATASIZE
0000001f: PUSH1 0x00
00000021: DUP3
00000022: CALLDATACOPY
00000023: PUSH1 0x20
00000025: DUP2
00000026: CALLDATASIZE
00000027: DUP2
00000028: DUP6
00000029: PUSH1 0x00
0000002b: NOT
0000002c: DELEGATECALL
0000002d: RETURNDATASIZE
0000002e: PUSH1 0x00
00000030: DUP4
00000031: RETURNDATACOPY
00000032: DUP1
00000033: DUP1
00000034: ISZERO
00000035: PUSH1 0x3b
00000037: JUMPI
00000038: RETURNDATASIZE
00000039: DUP4
0000003a: RETURN
0000003b: JUMPDEST
0000003c: RETURNDATASIZE
0000003d: DUP4
0000003e: REVERT
0000003f: INVALID
00000040: LOG1
00000041: PUSH6 0x627a7a723058
00000048: KECCAK256
00000049: SWAP10
0000004a: BLOBBASEFEE
0000004b: SWAP3
0000004c: PUSH20 0xd555ca8bc44fcf8da3a2cabbd1c3f99f20dc0407
00000061: UNKNOWN(0xFC)
00000062: SELFDESTRUCT
00000063: MCOPY
00000064: UNKNOWN(0xF7)
00000065: UNKNOWN(0xD6)
00000066: PUSH4 0xcc5f0029

Findings

validated = confirmed for call sinks; sink observed for others
Severity Category Tool Title Confidence Validated Confirmed Details
high other detector SELFDESTRUCT reachable 65 no no
view
trace_id: 0x1517f083bd150e259ed0af552781675379857e16379a2a851f53b7eafa071cff
validation_json 
{
    "sink": "SELFDESTRUCT",
    "errors": 0,
    "status": "unknown",
    "attempts": 1,
    "trace_id": "0x1517f083bd150e259ed0af552781675379857e16379a2a851f53b7eafa071cff",
    "confirmed": false,
    "trace_mode": "structLogs",
    "call_targets": null,
    "matched_probe": null,
    "target_varies": null,
    "classification": "no_sink"
}
witness_json 
{
    "notes": "heuristic witness; entrypoints are best-effort selectors with zeroed calldata",
    "constraints": [],
    "entrypoints": [
        {
            "calldata": "0x",
            "selector": "fallback",
            "calldata_variants": [
                "0x"
            ]
        }
    ]
}
evidence_json 
{
    "guards_detected": [],
    "selfdestruct_count": 1
}
high other cast SELFDESTRUCT present 85 no —
view
evidence_json 
{
    "notes": "selfdestruct can remove contract code and send funds; review reachability",
    "selfdestruct_count": 1
}
medium upgradeability cast DELEGATECALL present 80 no —
view
evidence_json 
{
    "notes": "delegatecall enables execution in caller context; common in proxies/upgradeable patterns",
    "delegatecall_count": 1
}