TW
Tripwire
Find contracts. Test them. Review real vulns.

Analysis Run

17a03d16-f846-4335-9d0d-d46cc58496c0

complete
Chain ID
1
Address
0xad95ce3eaafd9ef72b5c5f3f3dab92793eae8ce9
Block Number
—
Created
Sun, Jan 4, 2026 4:57 AM
Review Summary

What survived the funnel

Open this run to answer one question: is this real attacker-relevant behavior with real impact, or just normal contract plumbing?

back to vulns open contract
Confirmed
0
Validated
0
Source
Bytecode only
Review Backing
Not yet
Best current signal
Untrusted DELEGATECALL target reachable
crit 0 high 0 direct contract
Review Checklist
1. Read the findings table first. Ignore raw jobs until the result looks real.
2. Confirm attacker control, not just the existence of a sink.
3. Confirm money or privilege impact.
4. Keep it if the behavior is real. Kill it if this is normal proxy, admin, or upgrade plumbing.

Processing Jobs

Status & attempts
ID Type Status Attempts Heartbeat
31562 report.consolidate complete 1 / 1 3 months ago
77999 artifact.fetch complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
78000 tool.cast_disasm complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
78001 analysis.bundle complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
78002 capability.graph complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
78003 detector.run complete 1 / 3 1 week ago
78004 validation.fork complete 1 / 3 1 week ago

Artifact

Runtime bytecode: available
Creation TX: —
Deployer: —
Proxy: no
Implementation:
—
Verified Source: no

Slither

tool.slither

No slither job recorded yet.

Codex

report.consolidate
Job Status
complete
Attempts
1 / 1
Findings
0
No findings?
yes
Summary
Runtime bytecode is a minimal proxy (delegatecall) to fixed implementation 0x3ac40135480b94fbdbe14a5a13bc6874551c7e3b with no controllable target or evident value-transfer logic. No concrete profit path is visible from bytecode alone.
View stderr 
[codex:296151] OpenAI Codex v0.77.0 (research preview)
[codex:296151] --------
[codex:296151] workdir: /tmp/codex-multi-a1nouit0
[codex:296151] model: gpt-5.2-codex
[codex:296151] provider: openai
[codex:296151] approval: never
[codex:296151] sandbox: read-only
[codex:296151] reasoning effort: xhigh
[codex:296151] reasoning summaries: auto
[codex:296151] session id: 019b875d-afed-76c1-bf6c-0f1465a51cc7
[codex:296151] --------
[codex:296151] user
[codex:296151] You are a profit-focused exploit hunter analyzing EVM bytecode. Your ONLY goal is finding ways to extract value (ETH, tokens, NFTs) from this contract.
[codex:296151] 
[codex:296151] Read `BYTECODE_BUNDLE.txt` completely before concluding.
[codex:296151] 
[codex:296151] ONLY REPORT if you find a CONCRETE, EXPLOITABLE path to profit. We do NOT care about:
[codex:296151] - Gas inefficiency, code quality, or best practices
[codex:296151] - Theoretical vulnerabilities without a clear extraction path
[codex:296151] - Generic footguns (unchecked return values, etc.) unless they enable theft
[codex:296151] - Issues requiring social engineering or off-chain coordination
[codex:296151] 
[codex:296151] PATTERNS WORTH INVESTIGATING in bytecode:
[codex:296151] - CALL/DELEGATECALL with controllable destination or calldata
[codex:296151] - Value transfers (CALL with non-zero value) without prior CALLER/ORIGIN checks
[codex:296151] - SSTORE to low slots (0-10) that might be owner/admin storage
[codex:296151] - ecrecover (signature validation) - look for missing nonce/replay protection
[codex:296151] - External calls before state updates (reentrancy)
[codex:296151] - SELFDESTRUCT with controllable beneficiary
[codex:296151] - Proxy patterns (DELEGATECALL to storage slot) with unprotected upgrade paths
[codex:296151] 
[codex:296151] For each finding, you MUST explain:
[codex:296151] 1. The specific bytecode pattern/offsets that indicate the vulnerability
[codex:296151] 2. The concrete sequence of transactions to extract value
[codex:296151] 3. Why you believe this is exploitable (not just suspicious)
[codex:296151] 
[codex:296151] If you cannot identify a concrete profit path from bytecode alone: set no_findings=true.
[codex:296151] Do NOT hallucinate. Bytecode-only analysis is limited - be honest about uncertainty.
[codex:296151] 
[codex:296151] Output MUST be valid JSON matching the provided schema.
[codex:296151] - severity: info, low, medium, high, critical (use high/critical ONLY for clear extraction paths)
[codex:296151] - category: access_control, reentrancy, math, oracle, upgradeability, auth, other
[codex:296151] mcp startup: no servers
[codex:296151] 
[codex:296151] thinking
[codex:296151] **Preparing to read BYTECODE_BUNDLE.txt**
[codex:296151] exec
[codex:296151] /bin/bash -lc ls in /tmp/codex-multi-a1nouit0 succeeded in 5ms:
[codex:296151] BYTECODE_BUNDLE.txt
[codex:296151] codex-output-schema.json
[codex:296151] exec
[codex:296151] /bin/bash -lc 'cat BYTECODE_BUNDLE.txt' in /tmp/codex-multi-a1nouit0 succeeded in 5ms:
[codex:296151] Runtime bytecode bundle for best-effort auditing.
[codex:296151] Note: without verified source, conclusions are low-confidence unless a concrete pattern is visible.
[codex:296151] 
[codex:296151] FILE: runtime_bytecode.hex
[codex:296151] 0x6000808080803680928037733ac40135480b94fbdbe14a5a13bc6874551c7e3b5af43d828181803e808314602f57f35bfd
[codex:296151] 
[codex:296151] thinking
[codex:296151] **Analyzing minimal proxy bytecode**
[codex:296151] codex
[codex:296151] {"no_findings":true,"summary":"Runtime bytecode is a minimal proxy (delegatecall) to fixed implementation 0x3ac40135480b94fbdbe14a5a13bc6874551c7e3b with no controllable target or evident value-transfer logic. No concrete profit path is visible from bytecode alone.","findings":[]}
[codex:296151] tokens used
[codex:296151] 5,455
[codex:296151] {"no_findings":true,"summary":"Runtime bytecode is a minimal proxy (delegatecall) to fixed implementation 0x3ac40135480b94fbdbe14a5a13bc6874551c7e3b with no controllable target or evident value-transfer logic. No concrete profit path is visible from bytecode alone.","findings":[]}
Metadata 
{
    "codex": {
        "ran_at": "2026-01-04T04:57:14.064782+00:00",
        "returncode": 0
    },
    "summary": "Runtime bytecode is a minimal proxy (delegatecall) to fixed implementation 0x3ac40135480b94fbdbe14a5a13bc6874551c7e3b with no controllable target or evident value-transfer logic. No concrete profit path is visible from bytecode alone.",
    "raw_final": {
        "summary": "Runtime bytecode is a minimal proxy (delegatecall) to fixed implementation 0x3ac40135480b94fbdbe14a5a13bc6874551c7e3b with no controllable target or evident value-transfer logic. No concrete profit path is visible from bytecode alone.",
        "findings": [],
        "no_findings": true
    },
    "no_findings": true,
    "schema_version": 1
}

Opcode Heuristics

tool.cast_disasm
Delegatecall
1
Selfdestruct
0
CREATE2
0
CALL-family (heavy)
0
EXT*/BALANCE
0
Total opcodes
27
Flags
delegatecall_present
View cast disassembly output 
00000000: PUSH1 0x00
00000002: DUP1
00000003: DUP1
00000004: DUP1
00000005: DUP1
00000006: CALLDATASIZE
00000007: DUP1
00000008: SWAP3
00000009: DUP1
0000000a: CALLDATACOPY
0000000b: PUSH20 0x3ac40135480b94fbdbe14a5a13bc6874551c7e3b
00000020: GAS
00000021: DELEGATECALL
00000022: RETURNDATASIZE
00000023: DUP3
00000024: DUP2
00000025: DUP2
00000026: DUP1
00000027: RETURNDATACOPY
00000028: DUP1
00000029: DUP4
0000002a: EQ
0000002b: PUSH1 0x2f
0000002d: JUMPI
0000002e: RETURN
0000002f: JUMPDEST
00000030: REVERT

Findings

validated = confirmed for call sinks; sink observed for others
Severity Category Tool Title Confidence Validated Confirmed Details
critical upgradeability detector Untrusted DELEGATECALL target reachable 70 no no
view
trace_id: 0x57c494bfe3b067aa2c28125e959ed6d4517a2b3e15cca4efa68455d07c73e2dc
call_targets: 0x3ac40135480b94fbdbe14a5a13bc6874551c7e3b
target_varies: no
classification: constant_target
validation_json 
{
    "sink": "DELEGATECALL",
    "errors": 0,
    "status": "sink_reached",
    "attempts": 1,
    "trace_id": "0x57c494bfe3b067aa2c28125e959ed6d4517a2b3e15cca4efa68455d07c73e2dc",
    "confirmed": false,
    "trace_mode": "callTracer",
    "call_targets": [
        "0x3ac40135480b94fbdbe14a5a13bc6874551c7e3b"
    ],
    "matched_probe": null,
    "target_varies": false,
    "classification": "constant_target"
}
witness_json 
{
    "notes": "heuristic witness; entrypoints are best-effort selectors with zeroed calldata",
    "constraints": [],
    "entrypoints": [
        {
            "calldata": "0x",
            "selector": "fallback",
            "calldata_variants": [
                "0x"
            ]
        }
    ]
}
evidence_json 
{
    "examples": [
        {
            "pc": 33,
            "opcode": "DELEGATECALL",
            "returndata_checked": null,
            "value_expression_category": "n/a",
            "target_expression_category": "computed"
        }
    ],
    "guards_detected": [],
    "delegatecall_count": 1,
    "untrusted_delegatecall_count": 1
}
medium upgradeability cast DELEGATECALL present 80 no —
view
evidence_json 
{
    "notes": "delegatecall enables execution in caller context; common in proxies/upgradeable patterns",
    "delegatecall_count": 1
}