TW
Tripwire
Find contracts. Test them. Review real vulns.

Analysis Run

019bab3b-aa78-716f-954e-608b28af7b03

complete
Chain ID
1
Address
Block Number
Created
Sun, Jan 11, 2026 4:06 AM
Review Summary

What survived the funnel

Open this run to answer one question: is this real attacker-relevant behavior with real impact, or just normal contract plumbing?

Confirmed
0
Validated
0
Source
Verified
Review Backing
Not yet
Best current signal
Untrusted DELEGATECALL target reachable
crit 0 high 0 direct contract
Review Checklist
1. Read the findings table first. Ignore raw jobs until the result looks real.
2. Confirm attacker control, not just the existence of a sink.
3. Confirm money or privilege impact.
4. Keep it if the behavior is real. Kill it if this is normal proxy, admin, or upgrade plumbing.

Processing Jobs

Status & attempts
ID Type Status Attempts Heartbeat
38324 artifact.fetch complete 1 / 3 3 months ago
38325 proxy.resolve complete 1 / 3 3 months ago
38326 tool.cast_disasm complete 1 / 3 3 months ago
38327 analysis.bundle complete 1 / 3 3 months ago
38328 capability.graph complete 1 / 3 3 months ago
38329 detector.run complete 1 / 3 3 months ago
38330 validation.fork complete 1 / 3 3 months ago
38950 report.consolidate complete 1 / 6 3 months ago
38951 tool.slither complete 1 / 2 3 months ago

Artifact

Runtime bytecode: available
Creation TX:
Deployer:
Proxy: no not_proxy
Implementation:
Verified Source: yes
Proxy evidence
{
    "status": "not_proxy"
}

Slither

tool.slither
Status
complete
Attempts
1 / 2
Findings
0
Solc
0.6.12 (solc-select)
View stderr
'forge clean' running (wd: /tmp/slither-k5ww4qzg)
'forge config --json' running
'forge build --build-info --skip ./test/** ./script/** --force' running (wd: /tmp/slither-k5ww4qzg)

Proxy.constructor(address) (contracts/Contract.sol#6-15) uses assembly
	- INLINE ASM (contracts/Contract.sol#11-14)
Proxy.fallback() (contracts/Contract.sol#15-39) uses assembly
	- INLINE ASM (contracts/Contract.sol#18-39)
Reference: https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#assembly-usage

Version constraint 0.6.12 contains known severe issues (https://solidity.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bugs.html)
	- FullInlinerNonExpressionSplitArgumentEvaluationOrder
	- MissingSideEffectsOnSelectorAccess
	- AbiReencodingHeadOverflowWithStaticArrayCleanup
	- DirtyBytesArrayToStorage
	- DataLocationChangeInInternalOverride
	- NestedCalldataArrayAbiReencodingSizeValidation
	- SignedImmutables
	- ABIDecodeTwoDimensionalArrayMemory
	- KeccakCaching
	- EmptyByteArrayCopy
	- DynamicArrayCleanup.
It is used by:
	- 0.6.12 (contracts/Contract.sol#1)
solc-0.6.12 is an outdated solc version. Use a more recent version (at least 0.8.0), if possible.
Reference: https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#incorrect-versions-of-solidity
. analyzed (1 contracts with 100 detectors), 4 result(s) found
Metadata
{
    "solc": {
        "status": "ok",
        "use_rc": 0,
        "version": "0.6.12",
        "strategy": "solc-select",
        "solc_path": "/var/www/tripwire/.venv/bin/solc",
        "install_rc": 0,
        "use_stderr": null,
        "use_stdout": "Switched global version to 0.6.12",
        "install_stderr": null,
        "install_stdout": "Version '0.6.12' is already installed, skipping..."
    },
    "solc_args": "--base-path /tmp/slither-k5ww4qzg --allow-paths /tmp/slither-k5ww4qzg,/tmp/slither-k5ww4qzg/lib,/tmp/slither-k5ww4qzg/src",
    "remappings": [],
    "source_files": [
        "contracts/Contract.sol"
    ],
    "contract_count": 0,
    "contract_names": [],
    "detector_count": 4,
    "workspace_hash": "c18aca93c691692f18209f01e407c48b11f68434b4b6a8ff50968f765eb6c025",
    "duration_seconds": 0.4140307903289795,
    "solc_version_requested": "0.6.12"
}

Codex

report.consolidate
Job Status
complete
Attempts
1 / 6
Findings
0
No findings?
yes
Summary
Reviewed the only first‑party source (contracts/Contract.sol). The proxy stores an immutable logic address set at deployment and has no upgrade or admin surface; no exploitable issues were identified in scope.
View stdout
{"no_findings":true,"summary":"Reviewed the only first‑party source (contracts/Contract.sol). The proxy stores an immutable logic address set at deployment and has no upgrade or admin surface; no exploitable issues were identified in scope.","findings":[]}
View stderr
OpenAI Codex v0.77.0 (research preview)
--------
workdir: /tmp/codex-vcx1k4p6
model: gpt-5.2-codex
provider: openai
approval: never
sandbox: read-only
reasoning effort: high
reasoning summaries: auto
session id: 019bab5d-4479-7b52-a5bd-727bbcc233a7
--------
user
You are a security auditor. Audit this Solidity codebase for exploitable vulnerabilities.
Focus on: reentrancy, access control, upgradeability/proxy issues, signature validation, oracle manipulation,
accounting/invariant breaks, external call patterns, unchecked return values, and dangerous delegatecall.

Scope rules:
- You MUST fully read `AUDIT_BUNDLE.txt` before concluding. It contains the complete contents of all first-party Solidity sources in this workspace.
- Treat `lib/` and `@openzeppelin/` as third-party dependencies; skip them unless there is a concrete misuse angle in first-party code.
- If there are only dependency files and no first-party sources, set no_findings=true and explain in summary.

Output MUST be valid JSON matching the provided schema.
- If you find nothing meaningful: set no_findings=true and findings=[].
- Otherwise: set no_findings=false and include findings with severity/category/title and file/line locations when possible.

Output constraints (IMPORTANT):
- severity MUST be exactly one of: info, low, medium, high, critical (lowercase).
- category MUST be exactly one of: access_control, reentrancy, math, oracle, upgradeability, auth, other.
Keep summary short and concrete.
mcp startup: no servers

thinking
**Choosing method to read AUDIT_BUNDLE**
exec
/bin/bash -lc ls in /tmp/codex-vcx1k4p6 succeeded in 5ms:
AUDIT_BUNDLE.txt
codex-output-schema.json
contracts
exec
/bin/bash -lc 'cat AUDIT_BUNDLE.txt' in /tmp/codex-vcx1k4p6 succeeded in 7ms:
This file concatenates the full contents of first-party Solidity sources for auditing.
Do not treat dependency code under lib/ or @openzeppelin/ as first-party.

================================================================================
FILE: contracts/Contract.sol
================================================================================
pragma solidity 0.6.12;

contract Proxy {
    // Code position in storage is keccak256("PROXIABLE") = "0xc5f16f0fcc639fa48a6947836d9850f504798523bf8c9a3a87d5876cf622bcf7"
    uint256 constant PROXY_MEM_SLOT = 0xc5f16f0fcc639fa48a6947836d9850f504798523bf8c9a3a87d5876cf622bcf7;

    constructor(address contractLogic) public {
        // Verify a valid address was passed in
        require(contractLogic != address(0), "Contract Logic cannot be 0x0");

        // save the code address
        assembly {
            // solium-disable-line
            sstore(PROXY_MEM_SLOT, contractLogic)

thinking
**Evaluating proxy contract risks**
codex
{"no_findings":true,"summary":"Reviewed the only first‑party source (contracts/Contract.sol). The proxy stores an immutable logic address set at deployment and has no upgrade or admin surface; no exploitable issues were identified in scope.","findings":[]}
tokens used
5,925
Metadata
{
    "codex": {
        "ran_at": "2026-01-11T04:43:13.279356+00:00",
        "returncode": 0
    },
    "project": {
        "mode": "source",
        "file_count": 1,
        "import_count": 0,
        "first_party_contracts_count": 1
    },
    "summary": "Reviewed the only first\u2011party source (contracts/Contract.sol). The proxy stores an immutable logic address set at deployment and has no upgrade or admin surface; no exploitable issues were identified in scope.",
    "raw_final": {
        "summary": "Reviewed the only first\u2011party source (contracts/Contract.sol). The proxy stores an immutable logic address set at deployment and has no upgrade or admin surface; no exploitable issues were identified in scope.",
        "findings": [],
        "no_findings": true
    },
    "no_findings": true,
    "schema_version": 1
}

Opcode Heuristics

tool.cast_disasm
Delegatecall
1
Selfdestruct
0
CREATE2
0
CALL-family (heavy)
0
EXT*/BALANCE
0
Total opcodes
53
Flags
delegatecall_present proxy_like_runtime
View cast disassembly output
00000000: PUSH1 0x80
00000002: PUSH1 0x40
00000004: MSTORE
00000005: PUSH32 0xc5f16f0fcc639fa48a6947836d9850f504798523bf8c9a3a87d5876cf622bcf7
00000026: SLOAD
00000027: PUSH1 0x40
00000029: MLOAD
0000002a: CALLDATASIZE
0000002b: PUSH1 0x00
0000002d: DUP3
0000002e: CALLDATACOPY
0000002f: PUSH1 0x00
00000031: DUP1
00000032: CALLDATASIZE
00000033: DUP4
00000034: DUP6
00000035: GAS
00000036: DELEGATECALL
00000037: SWAP2
00000038: POP
00000039: RETURNDATASIZE
0000003a: DUP1
0000003b: PUSH1 0x00
0000003d: DUP4
0000003e: RETURNDATACOPY
0000003f: DUP3
00000040: DUP1
00000041: ISZERO
00000042: PUSH1 0x48
00000044: JUMPI
00000045: DUP2
00000046: DUP4
00000047: RETURN
00000048: JUMPDEST
00000049: DUP2
0000004a: DUP4
0000004b: REVERT
0000004c: INVALID
0000004d: LOG2
0000004e: PUSH5 0x6970667358
00000054: UNKNOWN(0x22)
00000055: SLT
00000056: KECCAK256
00000057: SSTORE
00000058: SHL
00000059: SGT
0000005a: POP
0000005b: UNKNOWN(0xF7)
0000005c: SSTORE
0000005d: DUP6
0000005e: SAR
0000005f: PUSH19 0x8f025e1e78d87c1a8cf67ba97458c753f6e1b3
00000073: PUSH28

Findings

validated = confirmed for call sinks; sink observed for others
Severity Category Tool Title Confidence Validated Confirmed Details
critical upgradeability detector Untrusted DELEGATECALL target reachable 70 no no
view
trace_id: 0x597a70a7470c8c82061ea40ebcd3213577653bd895ce084a3436c82d01d67ca9
call_targets: 0xa0919572e872abc038226ffd13823f6418833bac
target_varies: no
classification: constant_target
validation_json
{
    "sink": "DELEGATECALL",
    "errors": 0,
    "status": "sink_reached",
    "attempts": 1,
    "trace_id": "0x597a70a7470c8c82061ea40ebcd3213577653bd895ce084a3436c82d01d67ca9",
    "confirmed": false,
    "trace_mode": "callTracer",
    "call_targets": [
        "0xa0919572e872abc038226ffd13823f6418833bac"
    ],
    "matched_probe": null,
    "target_varies": false,
    "classification": "constant_target"
}
witness_json
{
    "notes": "heuristic witness; entrypoints are best-effort selectors with zeroed calldata",
    "constraints": [],
    "entrypoints": [
        {
            "calldata": "0x",
            "selector": "fallback",
            "calldata_variants": [
                "0x"
            ]
        }
    ]
}
evidence_json
{
    "examples": [
        {
            "pc": 54,
            "opcode": "DELEGATECALL",
            "returndata_checked": null,
            "value_expression_category": "n/a",
            "target_expression_category": "computed"
        }
    ],
    "guards_detected": [],
    "delegatecall_count": 1,
    "untrusted_delegatecall_count": 1
}
medium upgradeability cast DELEGATECALL present 80 no
view
evidence_json
{
    "notes": "delegatecall enables execution in caller context; common in proxies/upgradeable patterns",
    "delegatecall_count": 1
}
info upgradeability cast Likely proxy-like runtime 60 no
view
evidence_json
{
    "notes": "short runtime with SLOAD and DELEGATECALL resembles minimal proxy/upgradeable pattern",
    "sload_count": 1,
    "total_opcodes": 53,
    "delegatecall_count": 1
}